Back to Blog
TON

TON Is Becoming Gram: What Telegram Users Should Know

MyStars.tg Team9 min read
TON to Gram rebrand explainer showing the TON blockchain unchanged while the native token name changes from Toncoin to Gram.
TON stays the blockchain. Gram becomes the native token name if the vote passes.

On June 1, 2026, Pavel Durov said TON's native currency is becoming Gram. The official TON Vote proposal says the same thing in more precise terms: the native token would be renamed from Toncoin to Gram, and the ticker would change from TON to GRAM.

The important part is what does not change. TON remains the name of the blockchain. Gram is not a new token. There is no swap, no claim page, bridge, or migration. The official Toncoin channel announcement repeats the same no-action warning. If the vote passes, a wallet balance shown as 10 TON should simply become 10 GRAM once that wallet updates its labels.

For Telegram users, Stars buyers, creators, and mini app developers, this is mostly a naming change today. But it is not random. It fits a larger Telegram push to make TON feel less like a separate crypto project and more like the money layer under Telegram's apps, gifts, ads, creator tools, and payments.

What happened

Durov's post was short but loaded:

TON's native currency is becoming Gram. Gram was the original name of TON's currency in the first white paper. We're returning to our roots and starting a new chapter.

He also said the transition will take around three weeks, TON remains the blockchain name, and this is step 4 of 7 in the "Make TON Great Again" plan.

The TON community proposal adds the operational detail:

  • Native token name: Toncoin -> Gram
  • Ticker: TON -> GRAM
  • Blockchain name: still TON / The Open Network
  • Balances, addresses, smart contracts, NFTs, jettons, staking, and DeFi positions: unchanged
  • User action required: none
  • Vote window: June 1 to June 8, 2026
  • Rollout: if the vote passes, wallets, explorers, exchanges, and partners are expected to update over the following two weeks

That means the proposed timeline is roughly three weeks from vote opening to ecosystem rollout. The same core message also appears in the official Toncoin community-vote announcement: blockchain unchanged, token name and ticker only, no migration.

Is Gram a new coin?

No. This is the main safety point.

The proposal describes Gram as a new name and ticker for the existing native asset. It does not describe a new contract, a new chain, a token swap, or a migration. Anyone asking you to "claim GRAM", "convert TON", or connect your wallet to migrate is using the rebrand as scam bait.

This will matter because rebrands create a perfect phishing window. Some users will hear "new ticker" and assume they need to do something. They do not.

If you buy Telegram Stars with TON or compare TON vs USDT for Stars payments, the practical rule is simple: follow the checkout instructions shown by the service you are using. Do not follow random links from replies, DMs, ads, or search results.

Why bring back Gram now?

There are five likely reasons, and they fit together.

1. Telegram wants one clean story again

"Gram" was the original name connected to Telegram's first TON plan. Telegram's old TON and Gram public notice described the TON Blockchain and its native cryptocurrency as Grams, and said Grams were meant to act as a medium of exchange inside the TON ecosystem. The original TON technical paper also used the Gram name in its technical descriptions of balances and supply.

That original project never launched in its Telegram-led form. The network later lived on as The Open Network, and the token became known publicly as Toncoin.

Bringing back Gram is a way to reconnect the current TON ecosystem with the original Telegram narrative, without renaming the chain itself.

That last detail matters. "TON" has been doing double duty: it is the blockchain name, the ecosystem name, and the token ticker. "Gram" separates the asset from the network. Users can say: TON is the chain; GRAM is the coin.

2. Telegram is no longer acting like a distant partner

The timing lines up with Durov's previous MTONGA posts. In April, he said TON had become 10x faster. In May, he said fees had dropped roughly 6x, Telegram would replace the TON Foundation as the driving force behind TON, and Telegram would become the network's largest validator. He then framed Telegram's validator role as a way to strengthen decentralization.

That is the real "why now".

A token rebrand would look cosmetic if the product and governance story had not changed. But Telegram has been moving from "TON is adjacent to Telegram" toward "TON is Telegram's economic infrastructure." Once Telegram becomes the main driver, reviving the original token name becomes a stronger signal.

3. The technical base is better than it was a month ago

Durov framed the previous MTONGA steps around performance: faster blocks and subsecond transactions, lower fees, new tooling, and performance upgrades, plus a stronger validator setup.

That matters for branding. You do not want to rename the token and invite mainstream attention while users are still complaining about slow or expensive transactions. The rebrand makes more sense after the chain can support a more consumer-facing story.

For a normal Telegram user, the brand promise is not "interesting Layer 1 architecture." It is: cheap, fast, and safe enough to use inside apps they already know.

4. Telegram's economy is bigger now

Telegram Stars turned payments for digital goods into a native Telegram behavior. Telegram's own Stars announcement said bots and mini apps can sell digital goods and services with Stars, and developers would be able to withdraw earned Stars in Toncoin via Fragment.

Since then, TON has also become more visible in gifts, usernames, mini apps, creator monetization, and ads. Durov has called TON the economic backbone of Telegram.

That is the business context. If Telegram wants billions of users to understand the money layer, "Gram" is simpler than "Toncoin" and less confusing than using TON for both the network and the token.

5. The rebrand hints that more product changes are coming

Durov called this step 4 of 7 and said the rebranding will "pave the way for what comes next." The proposal does not reveal the next steps, so it would be wrong to pretend we know them.

But the pattern is visible: performance first, lower fees, Telegram leadership, then a cleaner token identity. That sequence looks like preparation for more visible Telegram-native finance and creator economy features.

For MyStars users, the near-term takeaway is not to speculate on price. The useful takeaway is operational: payment labels may change, official instructions may update, and scam attempts will probably spike during the transition window.

What changes for Telegram Stars users?

For now, not much.

Telegram Stars remain the in-app currency for digital goods, paid media, gifts, mini apps, and creator flows. TON/Gram is the blockchain asset underneath parts of the wider Telegram economy, including some payment and withdrawal routes.

If a checkout currently says TON, it may eventually say GRAM after the ecosystem rollout. The network should still be TON. The amount should not require a separate conversion step just because the display name changed.

If you are reading this during the transition, use this checklist:

  • Treat TON -> GRAM as a label change unless the official wallet or checkout says otherwise.
  • Never connect a wallet to a "claim GRAM" site.
  • Never send TON to a migration address.
  • Check whether the service is asking for TON network payments, not a random USDT or EVM network.
  • For Stars top-ups, follow the exact payment instructions shown at checkout.

If you need the broader difference between Stars and TON, read Telegram Stars vs TON. If you are paying for collectible gifts or creator content, Telegram Gifts, Stars, and TON explains where each asset fits.

What should creators and mini app builders watch?

The biggest change may be user language.

Creators do not need to teach their audience about validators, tickers, and old white papers. They need a short payment explanation that avoids panic:

"TON is the network. Gram is the native coin. You do not need to swap anything. Use the payment screen shown in Telegram or the official checkout."

Mini app teams should watch for three rollout details:

  • Wallet and explorer naming: when the UI starts showing GRAM instead of TON.
  • Exchange support: whether deposit and withdrawal labels update cleanly.
  • Support load: users asking whether they need to migrate funds.

The last point is underrated. A rebrand can be technically harmless and still create support noise. Clear copy will prevent mistakes.

MyStars take

This is mostly a trust-and-language move, not a chain upgrade.

Durov is using Gram to say: TON is back under Telegram's direct story, the chain is faster and cheaper, and the token now has a name that sounds like Telegram money rather than a developer-era coin label.

That does not mean users should rush to do anything. The safest action is boring: wait for official wallet and checkout labels to update, ignore migration links, and keep using Stars and crypto payment flows only through services you already trust.

If the vote passes, the best mental model is simple:

  • TON = the blockchain and ecosystem
  • GRAM = the native token formerly displayed as Toncoin / TON
  • Stars = Telegram's in-app currency for digital goods and creator payments

Different names, same underlying balance.

Sources and evidence

Primary sources used for this article:

Back to Blog